Non English Major EFL Learners’ Perceptions of DeepL Use in a General English Course

Authors

  • Asriani Hasibuan Universitas Labuhanbatu
  • Arfian Hikmat Ramdan Sekolah Tinggi Kesehatan Dharma Husada, Bandung, Indonesia.
  • Vidya Dwi Amalia Zati Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia.
  • Elysa Rohayani Hsb Universitas Labuhanbatu, Rantauprapat, Indonesia
  • Mila Nirmala Sari Universitas Labuhanbatu, Rantauprapat, Indonesia
  • Rosmidah Hasibuan Universitas Labuhanbatu, Rantauprapat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64733/journalalfa.v4i2s.230

Keywords:

DeepL, EFL Learners , General English Course, Information Systems Students , Machine Translation , Students’ Perceptions

Abstract

The rapid adoption of AI-based machine translation tools such as DeepL in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning has outpaced research on how non-English-major students perceive and use them, particularly in General English courses rather than translation-specific ones. This gap is significant, as such learners' attitudes and motives shape how they adopt and critically engage with AI-assisted tools. This study aimed to examine Information Systems students' perceptions of using DeepL in a General English course and to identify the factors influencing these perceptions. A descriptive qualitative design was employed, combining questionnaire and interview data through methodological triangulation. Participants were 14 second-semester Information Systems students at Universitas Labuhanbatu, selected through total purposive sampling. Data were collected using an 18-item five-point Likert questionnaire and a structured interview guide. Findings showed predominantly positive perceptions: five statements were rated "Strongly Agree," five "Agree," three "Neutral," and five negatively worded statements were interpreted as positive when Disagreed with. Interviews revealed that these perceptions were driven by positive attitudes and learning motives, time efficiency under assignment deadlines, and DeepL's perceived accuracy, naturalness, and accessibility relative to other translation tools. These findings suggest that instructors should design tasks promoting critical, reflective use of DeepL rather than prohibiting it, to maximize learning benefits while mitigating overreliance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aqmar, S., Gailea, N., Wijayanti, M. A., Sultan, U., & Tirtayasa, A. (2026). Cendikia pendidikan. 18(6), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.9644/sindoro.v3i9.267

Arnita, A., & Rusli, T. I. (2025). EFL Students ’ Perception of DeepL Translation Tool Utilization in Translating Scientific Published Research Articles. 5(2), 291–305.

Cahyani, R. D., Iswari, W. P., & Timur, K. (2025). Understanding EFL Students ’ Acceptance of DeepL for English Translation : A Technology Acceptance. 4778, 5672–5685. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.6831

Fathinah, F., Rusmawaty, D., Aridah, A., & Amarullah, A. K. (2025). DeepL as a Translanguaging Tool in an Indonesian EFL Student ’ s Academic Writing. 5(November), 170–193.

Fitriah, M., & Ardi, H. (2026). Students ’ Accuracy and Perceptions in Translating Descriptive Text with The Assistance of Deepl Translate. 18(1), 1–15.

Fitroh, N., & Dewi, N. M. (2026). English Edu : Journal of English Teaching and Learning Evaluating Deepl as a Translation Tool : Facilitating or Hindering for EFL Students ’ Language Acquisition. 5(1), 3–12.

Info, A. (2025). Efl Students ’ Acceptance of DeepL Translation : A. 9 (3), 599–610.

Laksana, K. N., & Komara, C. (2024). Indonesian EFL Students ’ Perceptions of DeepL Machine Translation Tool : Utilization , Advantages , and Disadvantages. 4(2), 256–276.

Le, T., & Vy, T. (2025). An Investigation Into The Impact of Google Translate on Efl Students ’ Self -Correction in Translation Tasks at a University , In The Mekong Delta , Vietnam. 117–144. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejmts.v5i1.655

Liang, L. (2025). The impact of using DeepL Translator on Chinese EFL students ’ story writing. In Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning (Vol. 5, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1515/jccall-2024-0009

Munawwarah, M. (2024). Students ’ Perception of Using DeepL as Machine. 5(2), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.22236/ellter.v5i2.15813.g4779

Payungallo, A. V., Kristen, U., & Wacana, S. (2026). Students ’ Experiences of Using Deepl in EFL Writing Classrooms : A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE. 13(1), 1–16.

Safitri, A., Nur, S., & Novinda, K. (2026). English Students ’ Perceptions of Using Machine Translation Yandex Tools in Final Project Writing. 11(3), 1081–1090.

Sunita, D., Asmara, M., Islam, U., Sumatera, N., Repelita, F., Kembaren, W., Islam, U., & Sumatera, N. (2024). Student ’ s Perception Towards the Use of DeepL Translator in Writing Thesis or Journal for English Education Students. 10(1), 117–126.

Thahilal, M., & Hasyb, J. (2025). Translating in the AI Era : A Phenomenological Study of Arabic Language Students ’ Use of DeepL Translate. 8(1), 646–657.

Translating, F. O. R., & Text, E. (2018). Eltin journal: 139–148.

Yoka, Y. W., & Zhang, J. (2026). Engaging With AI Tools in Translation Tasks : Chinese University EFL Students ’ Perceptions and Practices. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcal.70294

Downloads

Published

01-10-2026

How to Cite

Hasibuan, A., Arfian Hikmat Ramdan, Vidya Dwi Amalia Zati, Elysa Rohayani Hsb, Mila Nirmala Sari, & Rosmidah Hasibuan. (2026). Non English Major EFL Learners’ Perceptions of DeepL Use in a General English Course. Jurnal Alfa: Penelitian, Pendidikan, Dan Bahasa, 4(2s), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.64733/journalalfa.v4i2s.230

Issue

Section

Articles