Muarasipongi and Minangkabau Language Contact in Border of North Sumatera Utara-West Sumatera
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64733/angkola-mandailing.v2i1.231Keywords:
Language Contact, Minangkabau, Muarasipongi, North Sumatera, West SumateraAbstract
This study examined language contact between the Muarasipongi language, also referred to in recent documentation as Tanah Ulu, and Minangkabau in the North Sumatra-West Sumatra border area. The study addressed a gap in previous scholarship, which had documented lexical comparison, the creole status of Muarasipongi, phonological structure, and bilingual practices, but had rarely synthesised these findings specifically as a border-contact system. A qualitative secondary-data design was employed. Data were drawn from published linguistic studies, institutional documentation, and repository records concerning Muarasipongi, Tanah Ulu, Minangkabau, and the social interaction of border communities. The data were organised into four analytical domains: lexical contact, phonological adaptation, bilingualism and code choice, and sociocultural domains of language use. The synthesis showed that contact was not limited to isolated loanwords. It was associated with recurrent lexical convergence, phonological adaptation, bilingual repertoires, and functional language selection shaped by mobility, markets, intermarriage, and proximity to Rao and other Minangkabau-speaking areas. At the same time, the available evidence indicated that Muarasipongi/Tanah Ulu retained structural features that distinguished it from standard Minangkabau, so the contact outcome should not be reduced to simple dialect borrowing. The study therefore argued that the border functions as a linguistic contact zone in which local identity and external linguistic resources are negotiated simultaneously. The findings contributed a consolidated sociolinguistic interpretation of Muarasipongi language contact and provided a basis for future field-based corpus, variationist, and language-maintenance research.
Downloads
References
Agusnaldi, D. (2012). A study of lexical comparison in Muarasipongi language and the standard Minangkabaunese [Bachelor’s thesis, Universitas Negeri Padang]. Repository Universitas Negeri Padang.
Antoni, C., Irham, I., & Ronsi, G. (2019). Language variation in Minang colloquial language spoken in Kabun region: Sociolinguistic study on millennial citizens. Jurnal Arbitrer, 6(2), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.6.2.92-98.2019
Ariesty, A., Nadra, N., & Noviatri, N. (2022). Variasi bahasa Minangkabau di Kecamatan Mungka Kabupaten Lima Puluh Kota: Tinjauan dialektologi. Puitika, 17(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.25077/puitika.17.1.1-14.2021
Azis, A. D. (2020). Bugis language maintenance strategy in Lombok. SeBaSa, 3(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.29408/sbs.v3i2.2508
Collins, J. T. (2022). Language death in Indonesia: A sociocultural pandemic. Linguistik Indonesia, 40(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v40i2.347
Cohn, A. C., & Ravindranath, M. (2014). Local languages in Indonesia: Language maintenance or language shift? Linguistik Indonesia, 32(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v32i2.22
Dalimunthe, S. (2018). Hubungan kekerabatan bahasa Batak Mandailing dan bahasa Tanah Ulu (suatu kajian linguistik historis komparatif). Medan Makna, 16(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.26499/mm.v16i1.2276
Durkin, P. (2020). Contact and lexical borrowing. In R. Hickey (Ed.), The handbook of language contact. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119485094.ch8
Gaho, R., Kardana, I. N., & Sari, R. P. (2022). Linguistic landscape (LL): A theoretical review. KnE Social Sciences, 215–221. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i10.11290
Harahap, B. (2011). The status of language used in Muarasipongi: Is it a pidgin, a creole, or a language? [Bachelor’s thesis, Universitas Negeri Padang]. Repository Universitas Negeri Padang.
Hidayat, H., & Jufrizal, J. (2019). Phonological system of Muarasipongi Creole: Identification and distribution of phoneme. English Language and Literature, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v8i3.105744
Iwan, S. H., & Jannah, I. M. (2023). Local language maintenance: A cultural and sociolinguistic perspective. International Journal of Language and Culture, 1(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.63762/ijolac.v1i1.4
Kiegel-Keicher, Y. (2021). La integración de préstamos léxicos y la cuestión del aducto: Evidencia del contacto lingüístico árabe-romance. Revista Española de Lingüística, 51(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.31810/RSEL.51.1.3
Liando, N. V. F., Dallyono, R., Tatipang, D. P., & Lengkoan, F. (2023). Among English, Indonesian and local language: Translanguaging practices in an Indonesian EFL classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i1.58270
List, J.-M., Anderson, C., Greenhill, S. J., Mayer, T., Tresoldi, T., & Forkel, R. (2019). Automated methods for the investigation of language contact, with a focus on lexical borrowing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 13(10), e12355. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12355
Mataraw, M. K., & Adriansyah, H. (2023). Multilingualism and language ideologies in post-decentralization Indonesia: Implications for language-in-education policy. Jurnal Tahuri, 20(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.30598/tahurivol20issue1page59-79
Onosson, S., & Stewart, J. (2024). The effects of language contact on non-native vowel sequences in lexical borrowings: The case of Media Lengua. Language and Speech, 67(2), 498–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309211014911
Pujiama, S. O., Nadra, N., & Usman, F. (2021). Variasi leksikal bahasa Minangkabau di Kecamatan Lima Kaum, Kabupaten Tanah Datar: Tinjauan dialektologi. Puitika, 17(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.25077/puitika.17.1.33-50.2021
Purnawati, K. W., Artawa, K., & Satyawati, M. S. (2022). Linguistic landscape of Jalan Gajah Mada heritage area in Denpasar City. Jurnal Arbitrer, 9(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.9.1.27-38.2022
Rastitiati, N. K. J., & Suprastayasa, I. G. N. A. (2022). Multilingual signs: The linguistic landscape in Nusa Dua tourist area, Bali. LACULTOUR, 1(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.52352/lacultour.v1i1.783
Sari, N. F. (2022). Code switching and code mixing in classroom presentation of Indonesian EFL students. EDUCASIA, 7(2), 91–120. https://doi.org/10.21462/educasia.v7i2.71
Suksio, A., & Jufrizal, J. (2024). Phonetic-phonological and lexical comparison of Lubuk Basung sub-dialect with the standard Minangkabaunese. English Language and Literature, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v13i1.127742
Suprapti, S., Tanjung, Z., & Harahap, S. (1998). Budaya masyarakat perbatasan di Muarasipongi, Provinsi Sumatra Utara: Studi tentang adaptasi. Direktorat Sejarah dan Nilai Tradisional.
Wahyuni, A. E., Yannuar, N., Basthomi, Y., & Suharyadi, S. (2023). The negotiation of identities in multilingual settings as depicted in Indonesia dalem Api dan Bara. Linguistik Indonesia, 41(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v41i2.472
Yurfadilah, S., Parapat, L. H., Nurhidayah, H., Wildani, H., & Milqa, D. (2025). Shift of Muarasipongi language among teenagers in educational context. International Journal of Angkola-Mandailing Culture, 1(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.64733/journalangkola-mandailing.v1i1.100
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Angkola-Mandailing Culture

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in International Journal of Angkola-Mandailing Culture agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants IJAMAC the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


