Muarasipongi and Minangkabau Language Contact in Border of North Sumatera Utara-West Sumatera

Authors

  • Rahmat Huda
  • Mirna Yanti Universitas Muhamadiyah Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia
  • Silpi Misriani Universitas Muhamadiyah Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia
  • Kamilah Zahra Universitas Muhamadiyah Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia
  • Yusqori Fadilah Siregar Universitas Muhamadiyah Tapanuli Selatan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64733/angkola-mandailing.v2i1.231

Keywords:

Language Contact, Minangkabau, Muarasipongi, North Sumatera, West Sumatera

Abstract

This study examined language contact between the Muarasipongi language, also referred to in recent documentation as Tanah Ulu, and Minangkabau in the North Sumatra-West Sumatra border area. The study addressed a gap in previous scholarship, which had documented lexical comparison, the creole status of Muarasipongi, phonological structure, and bilingual practices, but had rarely synthesised these findings specifically as a border-contact system. A qualitative secondary-data design was employed. Data were drawn from published linguistic studies, institutional documentation, and repository records concerning Muarasipongi, Tanah Ulu, Minangkabau, and the social interaction of border communities. The data were organised into four analytical domains: lexical contact, phonological adaptation, bilingualism and code choice, and sociocultural domains of language use. The synthesis showed that contact was not limited to isolated loanwords. It was associated with recurrent lexical convergence, phonological adaptation, bilingual repertoires, and functional language selection shaped by mobility, markets, intermarriage, and proximity to Rao and other Minangkabau-speaking areas. At the same time, the available evidence indicated that Muarasipongi/Tanah Ulu retained structural features that distinguished it from standard Minangkabau, so the contact outcome should not be reduced to simple dialect borrowing. The study therefore argued that the border functions as a linguistic contact zone in which local identity and external linguistic resources are negotiated simultaneously. The findings contributed a consolidated sociolinguistic interpretation of Muarasipongi language contact and provided a basis for future field-based corpus, variationist, and language-maintenance research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agusnaldi, D. (2012). A study of lexical comparison in Muarasipongi language and the standard Minangkabaunese [Bachelor’s thesis, Universitas Negeri Padang]. Repository Universitas Negeri Padang.

Antoni, C., Irham, I., & Ronsi, G. (2019). Language variation in Minang colloquial language spoken in Kabun region: Sociolinguistic study on millennial citizens. Jurnal Arbitrer, 6(2), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.6.2.92-98.2019

Ariesty, A., Nadra, N., & Noviatri, N. (2022). Variasi bahasa Minangkabau di Kecamatan Mungka Kabupaten Lima Puluh Kota: Tinjauan dialektologi. Puitika, 17(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.25077/puitika.17.1.1-14.2021

Azis, A. D. (2020). Bugis language maintenance strategy in Lombok. SeBaSa, 3(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.29408/sbs.v3i2.2508

Collins, J. T. (2022). Language death in Indonesia: A sociocultural pandemic. Linguistik Indonesia, 40(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v40i2.347

Cohn, A. C., & Ravindranath, M. (2014). Local languages in Indonesia: Language maintenance or language shift? Linguistik Indonesia, 32(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v32i2.22

Dalimunthe, S. (2018). Hubungan kekerabatan bahasa Batak Mandailing dan bahasa Tanah Ulu (suatu kajian linguistik historis komparatif). Medan Makna, 16(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.26499/mm.v16i1.2276

Durkin, P. (2020). Contact and lexical borrowing. In R. Hickey (Ed.), The handbook of language contact. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119485094.ch8

Gaho, R., Kardana, I. N., & Sari, R. P. (2022). Linguistic landscape (LL): A theoretical review. KnE Social Sciences, 215–221. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i10.11290

Harahap, B. (2011). The status of language used in Muarasipongi: Is it a pidgin, a creole, or a language? [Bachelor’s thesis, Universitas Negeri Padang]. Repository Universitas Negeri Padang.

Hidayat, H., & Jufrizal, J. (2019). Phonological system of Muarasipongi Creole: Identification and distribution of phoneme. English Language and Literature, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v8i3.105744

Iwan, S. H., & Jannah, I. M. (2023). Local language maintenance: A cultural and sociolinguistic perspective. International Journal of Language and Culture, 1(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.63762/ijolac.v1i1.4

Kiegel-Keicher, Y. (2021). La integración de préstamos léxicos y la cuestión del aducto: Evidencia del contacto lingüístico árabe-romance. Revista Española de Lingüística, 51(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.31810/RSEL.51.1.3

Liando, N. V. F., Dallyono, R., Tatipang, D. P., & Lengkoan, F. (2023). Among English, Indonesian and local language: Translanguaging practices in an Indonesian EFL classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i1.58270

List, J.-M., Anderson, C., Greenhill, S. J., Mayer, T., Tresoldi, T., & Forkel, R. (2019). Automated methods for the investigation of language contact, with a focus on lexical borrowing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 13(10), e12355. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12355

Mataraw, M. K., & Adriansyah, H. (2023). Multilingualism and language ideologies in post-decentralization Indonesia: Implications for language-in-education policy. Jurnal Tahuri, 20(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.30598/tahurivol20issue1page59-79

Onosson, S., & Stewart, J. (2024). The effects of language contact on non-native vowel sequences in lexical borrowings: The case of Media Lengua. Language and Speech, 67(2), 498–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309211014911

Pujiama, S. O., Nadra, N., & Usman, F. (2021). Variasi leksikal bahasa Minangkabau di Kecamatan Lima Kaum, Kabupaten Tanah Datar: Tinjauan dialektologi. Puitika, 17(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.25077/puitika.17.1.33-50.2021

Purnawati, K. W., Artawa, K., & Satyawati, M. S. (2022). Linguistic landscape of Jalan Gajah Mada heritage area in Denpasar City. Jurnal Arbitrer, 9(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.9.1.27-38.2022

Rastitiati, N. K. J., & Suprastayasa, I. G. N. A. (2022). Multilingual signs: The linguistic landscape in Nusa Dua tourist area, Bali. LACULTOUR, 1(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.52352/lacultour.v1i1.783

Sari, N. F. (2022). Code switching and code mixing in classroom presentation of Indonesian EFL students. EDUCASIA, 7(2), 91–120. https://doi.org/10.21462/educasia.v7i2.71

Suksio, A., & Jufrizal, J. (2024). Phonetic-phonological and lexical comparison of Lubuk Basung sub-dialect with the standard Minangkabaunese. English Language and Literature, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v13i1.127742

Suprapti, S., Tanjung, Z., & Harahap, S. (1998). Budaya masyarakat perbatasan di Muarasipongi, Provinsi Sumatra Utara: Studi tentang adaptasi. Direktorat Sejarah dan Nilai Tradisional.

Wahyuni, A. E., Yannuar, N., Basthomi, Y., & Suharyadi, S. (2023). The negotiation of identities in multilingual settings as depicted in Indonesia dalem Api dan Bara. Linguistik Indonesia, 41(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v41i2.472

Yurfadilah, S., Parapat, L. H., Nurhidayah, H., Wildani, H., & Milqa, D. (2025). Shift of Muarasipongi language among teenagers in educational context. International Journal of Angkola-Mandailing Culture, 1(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.64733/journalangkola-mandailing.v1i1.100

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Huda, R., Mirna Yanti, Silpi Misriani, Kamilah Zahra, & Yusqori Fadilah Siregar. (2026). Muarasipongi and Minangkabau Language Contact in Border of North Sumatera Utara-West Sumatera. Journal of Angkola-Mandailing Culture, 2(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.64733/angkola-mandailing.v2i1.231

Issue

Section

Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)